If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission.Īmazon | Amazon UK | eBay | B&H Photo Categories Sony vs Fujifilm Reminder: the links below are affiliate links. But the Sony has been around for longer, so not only does it cost less but it could benefit from further discounts, so keep an eye on that. Personally, I’d be more inclined to get the X-S10 because I think it ticks almost all the boxes for a camera in this price range. It also benefits from a better lens eco-system once you look further than the APS-C range. The A6400 has a better autofocus, is dust and moisture resistant, has unlimited recording and its video quality can be configured very precisely if that is something of interest to you. The X-S10 looks like a well-rounded package for the price: you get an excellent sensor for stills and video, a good autofocus system, super fast continuous shooting, in-body image stabilisation, a multi-angle screen and a large grip that should make the ergonomics and ease of use one of its strong characteristics. You can read more about how the three Sony cameras compare on our dedicated article. The A6600 is more expensive ($1400 body only) but has a larger grip in comparison to the other two Sonys, a bigger battery and 5-axis stabilisation. Add on $100 for the 16-50mm compact zoom lens or $400 for the 18-135mm 3.5-5.6.Īs usual, prices are as of the publishing date of this article (October 2020) unless otherwise stated. The Fujifilm X-S10 is available at the price of $1000, £950 or €1000 for the body only. Granted, some of these lenses are expensive or a bit big for the compact A6400, but at least there is the choice. While the APS-C selection might not look as good as Fuji, once you open to the full frame selection and all the third party manufacturers that have invested into the system, there is a lot of choice. Viltrox is the one making the most effort right now, being one of the only non-Fuji brands to offer autofocus, but its lenses are available for Sony too. What is missing is more lenses from third party manufacturers. Thanks to the large grip of the X-S10, even large lenses like the 16-55mm 2.8 or the 100-400mm should be comfortable enough to use. But at least they are an indication of which might perform better.īoth cameras can be charged or powered via the USB-C port.įujifilm offers a good catalogue of lenses with a balanced selection of zooms and primes. That said, remember that these CIPA official ratings are always lower than what you can get in the real world. Left: Sony NP-FW50 – Right: Fujifilm NP-W126S The Sony is smaller overall, and that is also helped by the position of the viewfinder, which is included in the main frame on the left of the camera rather than sticking out from the top like the Fuji model. The two cameras share a few similarities but there are also some important differences concerning the design. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. If you buy something after clicking one of these links, we will receive a small commission. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Within the article, there are affiliate links. Let’s have a look at how the X-S10 compares to its closest rival, the A6400.Įthics statement: the following is based on our direct experience with the A6400 and official information about the X-S10. In doing so, Fuji has become a tougher competitor for the company that has dominated the mirrorless APS-C market for years, Sony. To me, the goal is clear: the company wants a bigger share of the APS-C market, and the new camera is priced to become one of the most attractive offerings in the mid-level segment. The Fujifilm X-S10, a recent addition to the X-series, is a subtle yet distinctive departure from the other models when it comes to design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |